Blog
Tag
- 2SLGBTQIA+
- AODA
- Accessibility
- Bonuses & Incentives
- British Columbia
- COVID-19
- Canada Labour Code
- Certification
- Citizenship Requirements
- Compensation Changes
- Compliance Deadlines
- Constructive Dismissal
- Contract Drafting
- Creed
- Damages
- Disability & Leaves
- Discrimination
- Duty to Accommodate
- ESA
- Electronic Monitoring
- Employment Insurance
- Equity Compensation
- Family Status
- Federal
- Federally Regulated Employers
- Firm Milestones
- Firm Wins
- Frustration of Contract
- Gig Workers
- Human Rights Code
- Human Rights Tribunal
- IDEL
- Inclusion
- Inducement
- Intellectual Property
- Job Postings
- Just Cause
- Labour Board
- Labour Board, Ontario
- Language Requirements
- Layoffs
- Litigation
- Media Coverage
- Minimum Wage
- Mitigation
- Moonlighting
- Multi-Jurisdictional
- OHSA
- Ontario
- Ontario Court of Appeal
What Constitutes an “Appropriate” Workplace Investigation? Labour Board Weighs In.
Ontario employers are required under the Occupational Health and Safety Act (“OHSA”) to investigate incidents and complaints of workplace harassment in a manner that is “appropriate in the circumstances.” There has been relatively little guidance on what this means in practice.